Pastoral. Arcadian. Rustic. Bucolic. Cultural associations between agriculture and peacetime have become so inextricable that the two concepts are often synonymous in connotation. Phrases from texts such as the Bible’s “beat their swords into plowshares” go even further in framing the relationship between farming and warfare as both dichotomous and mutually exclusive. But history reveals that the opposite is usually true: Agriculture and war often advance in lockstep, mutually benefiting from the same technologies. Indeed, there is a much more sinister relationship between farming, which feeds life, and war, which destroys it. Nowhere is this link more conspicuous than in the production of fertilizers.
Popularized a century ago, modern fertilizers—which rely on the fixing of inert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into highly reactive and nitrogen rich ammonia (NH3)—were developed by the Germans in the buildup and aftermath of World War I. First used as a vital component in the production of explosives and poison gases, the mass production of ammonia was quickly coopted into the production of fertilizers, igniting what would become nothing short of an agricultural revolution.
An estimated three billion people are alive today thanks to increased food availability due to boosted yields from nitrogen fertilizers. But the global population keeps ballooning, and overuse of nitrogen fertilizers has become a problem, imperiling the very ecosystems scientists had hoped to optimize. As a result, environmental and food conflict risks are mounting. Numerous innovations in fertilizer use have been made in recent decades, but given the strain on resources, will they be enough?
Of course, fertilizers did exist before the advent of synthetically produced nitrogen. Both crushed animal bones and excrement have been used for centuries, as they contain potassium nitrate, a naturally occurring nitrogen-rich substance capable of providing the needed substance to crops. Often called saltpeter, this substance’s value increased exponentially when repurposed for a new role in warfare.
Gunpowder, first produced in China, arrived in Europe in the late 13th century and quickly became a defensive necessity for the continent’s warring fiefdoms. While charcoal gives gunpowder its characteristic black color, the active ingredient in animal bones and excrement, saltpeter, gives gunpowder its all-important pop. Chemically a mystery at the time, saltpeter’s dual use for growing crops and blowing open castle gates was understandably hard to ignore. So much so, in fact, that King Charles I of England ordered his subjects to collect their urine with the purpose of creating nitrate beds for future small-scale saltpeter mining.
By the 18th century, domestic production of saltpeter could neither meet the military aspirations of most European empires nor their subjects’ rapidly multiplying stomachs. Conversely, innovations in transport, especially across previously unnavigable seas, made conquering new lands and obtaining new resources increasingly possible. Within decades, both saltpeter mines in Chile and deposits of guano, the nitrogen-rich excrement of birds and bats, in Peru became key sources of fertilizer and gunpowder for Europe, setting the stage for a prolonged period of jockeying for their control.
The first, aptly called the Guano War, was fought in the 1860s between Spain and its former colonies Peru and Chile. The war was sparked by Spain’s seizure of the Chincha Islands—whose guano deposits the Peruvian government sold to pay all of its outstanding debts. Peru’s robust counter forced the Spanish fleet to circumnavigate the world in retreat, a decisive victory for the former colonies. Less than 15 years later, however, the South American countries were again quarreling over resources, but this time among themselves. From 1879 to 1883, the Saltpeter War pitted Peru and Bolivia against Chile for control over the lifeless Atacama Desert, both to better establish the region’s borders and to gain access to the world’s largest-known reserves of saltpeter nitrates. Emerging victorious, Chile seized key pieces of infrastructure, such as the region’s main nitrate-transporting railroad, which would go on to form the basis of the country’s economy; between the mid-1880s and the mid-1890’s, export taxes on nitrates received by the Chilean Government jumped from 43 to 68 percent of its total revenue.
The immense value of these exports, of course, came from the growing prosperity—and subsequent arms race—of 19th century European empires. However, like the other sources of nitrogen before it, guano could not meet all of the demands of a rapidly industrializing world. By the 1880s, the majority of guano on the Chincha Islands had been excavated—about 20 million tonnes in 40 years—causing empires to rely almost entirely on Chile’s deposits of saltpeter. Moreover, the breakneck growth and militarization of Europe, coupled with dwindling supplies of essential resources, suggested that further conflict was not a question of if, but when.
With the diverse uses and dwindling supplies of both guano and saltpeter in mind, European scientists raced to secure more reliable sources of nitrogen compounds. Countless numbers of the continent’s premier scientists tried their hands at solving the elusive riddle of artificial ammonia production. Some, such as Wilhelm Ostwald, were flat out incorrect in their findings, while others, including Kristian Birkeland, simply could not find an efficient-enough solution. Regardless, attempts came closer to success each year, and the looming shadow of war ensured that these efforts did not go fiscally unrewarded.
For Germany especially, additional sources of ammonia were crucial. Only unified in 1871, Germany’s young government at times struggled to feed its rapidly growing population. Compounded by the country’s relatively poor soils and lack of significant empire compared to its rivals, Germany was forced to import increasingly burdensome amounts of Chilean saltpeter. Between just 1900 and 1912, Germany’s saltpeter imports jumped from 350,000 tonnes to nearly 900,000 tonnes. The United States, with a population roughly 30 percent larger than Germany’s at the time, consumed only about half as much saltpeter. Meanwhile, from 1908 to 1913, military spending among major European powers increased by roughly 50 percent, further exacerbating Germany’s self-perceived vulnerabilities. Germany needed nitrogen for both fertilizer and weapons, though its imported supply from Chile was becoming precarious. Increasingly consumed by an intensifying arms race with the United Kingdom, yet lacking the vast and diverse empire of its maritime rival, Germany rested its hopes on a solution from within.
Thus, when a German chemist named Fritz Haber successfully derived ammonia from the essentially limitless inert nitrogen in the earth’s atmosphere, his rapidly militarizing homeland quickly took notice. Yet Haber’s first experiments were more a triumph of theory rather than of practice. In 1909, Haber could still only produce modest quantities of ammonia, or just 125 milliliters an hour. By the outbreak of World War I, Germany still needed to import Chilean saltpeter to meet demand. Unsurprisingly, the British moved quickly to cut off Germany’s access to the vital saltpeter deposits in Chile. Half a world away and defended by the world’s largest navy, Chilean saltpeter was no longer an option for Germany over the remainder of the war. But soon it wouldn’t matter. Haber had already cracked the code, and it was only a matter of time before Germany figured out how to scale up production.
The technology available for industrial production had been available as early as 1913, developed by a research team led by a scientist named Carl Bosch from chemical giant BASF. But it would take years before Germany could produce enough ammonia to make up for lost saltpeter imports after the British navy cut off supply. Over the next four years of war, the German government would go on to spend a staggering $100 million—the equivalent of $2.4 billion today—to develop and construct nitrogen fixation plants. German agriculture would see some benefits, but with all efforts pointed toward the war, major innovation in producing nitrogen fertilizer would have to wait. Although by dubious means, these investments in the so-called Haber-Bosch process helped Germany fuel its explosives, feed its people, and extend the length of the war by over a year.
Haber’s invention would also infamously contribute to the war effort through military uses other than explosives. On the war’s notorious western front, advances by both sides had stalled, and casualties continued to mount. Frustrated by the impasse, the German government granted use of chlorine gas, a weapon that would have been impossible to produce without the Haber-Bosch process. Although casualties from the gas itself were relatively limited, its application represented a new and horrifying chapter in both chemical and psychological warfare. Instrumental to the production of ammonia—and therein poison gas, explosives, and the Central Powers’ food supply—Ludwigshafen, Germany, the home to BASF’s plants, also earned the dubious distinction in 1915 of being the target of one of the world’s first strategic aerial bombardment, again signaling the vital and enmeshed nature of nitrogen-fixation and its uses.
After the end of World War I, large-scale efforts to use the Haber-Bosch process for agricultural purposes became the priority. Luckily for the rebuilding effort, the transition from explosives to agricultural uses was relatively simple, as ammonia, which is gaseous at room temperature, can easily be turned into salts and solutions. Soon enough, British and American efforts to produce ammonia using the Haber-Bosch process were also successful. But while significant improvements were made in the interwar period, it was not until World War II, which would demand even more ammonia for explosives, that ammonia production modernized enough to impact agriculture on a mass scale.
From a scientific perspective, it should come as no surprise that Haber also sowed the seeds of an agricultural revolution. Haber’s process of nitrogen fixation uniquely mimics the soil’s organic process for obtaining nitrogen.
Intrinsically, bacteria often form symbiotic relationships with plants by which they convert atmospheric nitrogen, a stable and unreactive composition, into ammonia, a stable but reactive form of nitrogen. Lightning strikes can also provide another source of nitrogen for the soil as their force converts atmospheric nitrogen into nitric acid. This usable supply of nitrogen allows plants to undergo photosynthesis, grow larger, and become more fertile. Excess ammonia that plants don’t use is returned to the atmosphere by bacteria through a process called denitrification.
The Haber-Bosch process supplants this natural exchange of nitrogen between air and soil by tapping into the unlimited supply of nitrogen in the atmosphere. The process is more akin to a lightning strike than bacterial symbiosis, as it requires 200 atmospheres of pressure, 450 degrees Celsius of heat, and an iron catalyst to create the necessary conditions to produce ammonia. In the 1950s, farmers shunted pressurized containers of gaseous ammonia into the ground, providing an injection of nitrogen into the soil that allowed for previously unprecedented plant growth. Ammonia was eventually used to create other nitrogen compounds that act as fertilizers, including urea, a dry substance, which can more easily be mixed with other vital nutrients for plant growth, namely potassium and phosphorous. However, the general principle of enriching, and often over enriching, soil with nitrogen has remained the same since the invention of the Haber-Bosch process.
Unsurprisingly, crop yields from the 1950s onward grew exponentially. Along with improved seed varieties, artificial pesticides and better irrigation techniques, wide use of nitrogen fertilizers played a major role in what became known as the Green Revolution, the staggering jump in crop yields in developed countries in the mid-20th century thanks to new technologies. Corn yields in the United States, for example, which rarely reached 30 bushels per acre before 1940, were suddenly above 40 bushels per acre in the 1950s and eventually hit triple digits in 1978/79 with a 101 bushel-per-acre harvest. While other improvements like seeds and pesticides continue to make larger strides today in terms of improvement, nitrogen fertilizers remain crucial. The Nitrogen in Europe Assessment, published in 2011, estimates that, without nitrogen fertilizer, the EU-27 would only produce 86 million tons of wheat on average instead of 150. Since 1950, the world’s population has grown by 168 percent, with increased yields indubitably supporting this rapid population growth.
Given the revolutionary effects of the Haber-Bosch process, it may come as a surprise that a growing chorus of scientists and governments are warning of a future in which humans continue to use nitrogenous fertilizers at the rate we do today. Further, like the nitrogen stored on the Chincha Islands, production of nitrogen via the Haber process cannot sustainably feed an ever growing population.
Haber’s invention may have solved the issue of supply, but new constraints have since arisen as the intensive use of nitrogen on farms proves to be increasingly detrimental to the environment. Thirty to 50 percent of nitrogen injected into the ground is unused by crops and instead ends up as runoff, causing excessive growth of plants in lakes and streams. In these so called dead zones, the excessive plant growth suffocates all aquatic life underneath; currently, a dead zone the size of Connecticut exists in the Gulf of Mexico due to runoff from Midwestern farms that enters the gulf from the Mississippi River.
Excessive nitrogen similarly destroys the atmosphere. Nitrous oxide, a product of nitrogen fertilizers, is 300 times more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide and has contributed to the resurgence of acid rain in developed countries such as the United States. These globalized effects of nitrogen pollution offer no easy solution, especially considering the essential role that artificial fertilizers play in feeding the population. Most searingly, recent research indicates that synthetic nitrogen destroys the soil over the long term by decreasing its ability to retain water and increasing its dependency on artificial nitrogen sources.
While a combination of government action and technological innovation will be necessary to overcome this environmental hazard, applying solutions such as using genetically modified crops and precision agriculture techniques to efficiently use nitrogen will be difficult in those countries that need it the most.
To combat the inherent limits of fertilizers, such as the acute environmental risks associated with excess use, numerous innovations have been made in recent decades. Chiefly, drones have been increasingly used for agricultural purposes as the precision agriculture industry continues to flourish. In fact, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) projects that more than 80 percent of the drone market will target agricultural uses in the next 10 years. Also first developed around the time of World War I, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been used by the military since the late 20th century to coordinate attacks and provide constant aerial imagery of areas too dangerous for manned planes to fly over. As drones too have evolved over the past century, current iterations are now small and cheap enough for relatively unrestricted public use. Based on the tenets of efficiency, drones, coupled with various analytics software, allow farmers to better assess the health of their crops and therefore more efficiently use both water and fertilizers. Fittingly, drones, like synthetic ammonia, were also first developed for the military.
Recent studies have also highlighted the exciting prospects of controlled-release fertilizers, for compounds such as urea, rather than the method of indiscriminate spraying commonly used today. As mentioned previously, less than half of nitrogen applied is absorbed by plants, and the remainder contributes to a host of other environmental imbalances. By incorporating slow-release fertilizers, plants are able to absorb more nutrients, farmers need apply less fertilizer, and ecosystem damage is reduced. In corn, for example, deep application of controlled-release urea increases water use efficiency, net income, and yields by 3.2, 4.2 and 6.5 percent, respectively.
Genetically modified (GM) varieties designed to boost yields also offered some promise initially, but their efficacy is uncertain. For one, some countries that could benefit from higher yields, including India, have been hostile to the introduction of GM crops. And new research suggests that adoption might not even be the solution. A May 2016 report from the National Academy of Sciences concluded that GM varieties have not significantly increased the rate at which yields for major crops were already increasing
Looking ahead, China, Brazil, and India pose the greatest problem in lowering the world’s nitrogen use. While countries such as the United States have the organizational capacity and capital to invest in the measures necessary to curb nitrogen pollution, less-developed countries are not necessarily capable of implementing efficient farming techniques.
China, the largest consumer of synthetic nitrogen, provides a useful and terrifying use case for the difficulty of limiting nitrogen fertilizers in developing countries. Food security is a paramount issue on both an individual and bureaucratic level for China and its people. Many Chinese citizens grew up in the wake of the country’s Great Famine and now supremely value their abundant food supply. The Chinese government has similarly placed a high priority on food security for its people. This priority has led to heavy nitrogen subsidies that allow 22 percent of the world's population to be fed on 7 percent of the world’s arable land. In some cases, researchers have found that Chinese farmers could use two-thirds less nitrogen fertilizer and receive the same or better results when growing staples like corn or rice. While officials have begun to tackle the environment disasters that have already taken China, organizing the means to ensure more responsible nitrogen use is difficult in a farming society that is still largely decentralized; most farmers still own only an acre of land and the government hasn’t been able to create a “coherent management strategy of policy” to take on excessive nitrogen use.
There are clear environmental and food security threats from nitrogen fertilizer overuse, especially in agricultural practices. But can the world actually mobilize to reverse this trend? If history is to act as a guide, the next leap forward for agriculture may only follow one in warfare. It’s not difficult to imagine that a period of extreme conflict could ultimately precipitate the innovations needed to prosper in the future, not unlike the Haber-Bosch process and World War I. Hopefully, the growing threat of diminishing resources will be enough to catalyze change.
Of course, it is difficult to predict the trajectory that the effects of technological innovations will have on global society. What is clear, however, is that rather than representing distinct and mutually exclusive chapters of human history, agriculture and warfare are often engendered by the same innovative and disruptive technological forces. BASF—the first company to manufacture ammonia using the Haber process and now one of the largest fertilizer producers in the world—offers a prime example of the link between military and agricultural innovation. In other words, while our military innovations have fueled agricultural productivity and prosperity on previously unseen levels, it may be our agricultural innovations that ultimately divert us from a potential future of war.
Receive our research in your inbox
Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter!
What Information Do We Collect?
The information we gather enables us to personalize, improve and continue to operate the Services. We collect the following types of information from our users.
IP Address Information and Other Information Collected Automatically:
· We automatically receive and record information from your web browser when you interact with the Services, including your IP address and cookie information. This information is used for fighting spam/malware and also to facilitate collection of data concerning your interaction with the Services (e.g., what links you have clicked on).
· Generally, the Services automatically collect usage information, such as the number and frequency of visitors to the Site. We may use this data in aggregate form, that is, as a statistical measure, but not in a manner that would identify you personally. This type of aggregate data enables us and third parties authorized by us to figure out how often individuals use parts of the Services so that we can analyze and improve them.
Information Collected Using Cookies:
· Most browsers have an option for turning off the cookie feature, which will prevent your browser from accepting new cookies, as well as (depending on the sophistication of your browser software) allowing you to decide on acceptance of each new cookie in a variety of ways.
We collect statistical information about how users collectively use the Services (“Aggregate Information”). Some of this information may be derived from Personal Information. This statistical information is not Personal Information and cannot be tied back to you or your web browser.
How, and With Whom, Is My Information Shared?
IP Address Information:
Information You Elect to Share:
We share Aggregate Information with our partners, service providers and other persons with whom we conduct business. We share this type of statistical data so that our partners can understand how and how often people use our Services and their services or websites, which facilitates improving both their services and how our Services interface with them. In addition, these third parties may share with us non-private, aggregated or otherwise non Personal Information about you that they have independently developed or acquired.
Information Shared with Our Agents:
We employ and contract with people and other entities that perform certain tasks on our behalf and who are under our control (our “Agents”). We may need to share Personal Information with our Agents in order to provide products or services to you. Unless we tell you differently, our Agents do not have any right to use Personal Information or other information we share with them beyond what is necessary to assist us. You hereby consent to our sharing of Personal Information with our Agents.
Information Disclosed Pursuant to Business Transfers:
In some cases, we may choose to buy or sell assets. In these types of transactions, user information is typically one of the transferred business assets. Moreover, if we, or substantially all of our assets, were acquired, or if we go out of business or enter bankruptcy, user information would be one of the assets that is transferred or acquired by a third party. You acknowledge that such transfers may occur, and that any acquirer of us or our assets may continue to use your Personal Information as set forth in this policy.
Information Disclosed for Our Protection and the Protection of Others:
Information We Share With Your Consent:
Except as set forth above, you will be notified when your Personal Information may be shared with third parties, and will be able to prevent the sharing of this information.
Is Information About Me Secure?
We store all of our information, including your IP address information, using industry-standard techniques. We do not guarantee or warrant that such techniques will prevent unauthorized access to information about you that we store, Personal Information or otherwise.
What Information of Mine Can I Access?
You can access and delete cookies through your web browser settings.
California Privacy Rights: Under California Civil Code sections 1798.83-1798.84, California residents are entitled to ask us for a notice identifying the categories of personal customer information which we share with our affiliates and/or third parties for marketing purposes, and providing contact information for such affiliates and/or third parties. If you are a California resident and would like a copy of this notice, please submit a written request to the following address: 12 E 49th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10017
What If I Have Questions or Concerns?
If you have any questions or concerns regarding privacy using the Services, please send us a detailed message to email@example.com. We will make every effort to resolve your concerns.
Effective Date: March 11, 2014
b. You shall not (directly or indirectly):i. take any action that imposes or may impose (as determined by us in our sole discretion) an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on our (or our third party providers’) infrastructure;ii. interfere or attempt to interfere with the proper working of the Services or any activities conducted on the Services;iii. bypass, circumvent or attempt to bypass or circumvent any measures we may use to prevent or restrict access to the Services (or other accounts, computer systems or networks connected to the Services);iv. use manual or automated software, devices, or other processes to “crawl” or “spider” any page of the Site;
v. harvest or scrape any Content from the Services;
vi. otherwise take any action in violation of our guidelines and policies;vii. decipher, decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer or otherwise attempt to derive any source code or underlying ideas or algorithms of any part of the Services (including without limitation any application), except to the limited extent applicable laws specifically prohibit such restriction;viii. modify, translate, or otherwise create derivative works of any part of the Services; orix. copy, rent, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer any of the rights that you receive hereunder.c. We also reserve the right to access, read, preserve, and disclose any information as we reasonably believe is necessary to:i. satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request;ii. enforce these Terms of Service, including investigation of potential violations hereof;
iii. detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or technical issues;
iv. respond to user support requests; or
v. protect the rights, property or safety of us, our users and the public.4. Third Party Services. The Services may permit you to link to other websites, services or resources on the Internet, and other websites, services or resources may contain links to the Services. When you access third party resources on the Internet, you do so at your own risk. These other resources are not under our control, and you acknowledge that we are not responsible or liable for the content, functions, accuracy, legality, appropriateness or any other aspect of such websites or resources. The inclusion of any such link does not imply our endorsement or any association between us and their operators. You further acknowledge and agree that we shall not be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such content, goods or services available on or through any such website or resource.5. Termination. We may terminate your access to all or any part of the Services at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice, effective immediately. All provisions of these Terms of Service which by their nature should survive termination shall survive termination, including, without limitation, ownership provisions, warranty disclaimers, indemnity and limitations of liability.6. Warranty Disclaimer.a. You release us from all liability for you having acquired or not acquired Content through the Services. We make no representations concerning any Content contained in or accessed through the Services, and we will not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, copyright compliance, or legality of material or Content contained in or accessed through the Services.b. THE SERVICES AND CONTENT ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” AND WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND ANY WARRANTIES IMPLIED BY ANY COURSE OF PERFORMANCE OR USAGE OF TRADE, ALL OF WHICH ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. WE, AND OUR DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, PARTNERS AND CONTENT PROVIDERS DO NOT WARRANT THAT: (I) THE SERVICES WILL BE SECURE OR AVAILABLE AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME OR LOCATION; (II) ANY DEFECTS OR ERRORS WILL BE CORRECTED; (III) ANY CONTENT AVAILABLE AT OR THROUGH THE SERVICES IS FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS; OR (IV) THE RESULTS OF USING THE SERVICES WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS.7. Limitation of Liability. IN NO EVENT SHALL WE, NOR OUR DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, PARTNERS, SUPPLIERS OR CONTENT PROVIDERS, BE LIABLE UNDER CONTRACT, TORT, STRICT LIABILITY, NEGLIGENCE OR ANY OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICES FOR ANY (I) LOST PROFITS, DATA LOSS, COST OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES, OR SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, COMPENSATORY OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER, SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES (HOWEVER ARISING), (II) BUGS, VIRUSES, TROJAN HORSES, OR THE LIKE (REGARDLESS OF THE SOURCE OF ORIGINATION), OR (III) DIRECT DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF $50.00.8. Governing Law and Jurisdiction. These Terms of Service shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, including its conflicts of law rules, and the United States of America. You agree that any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms of Service shall be governed by the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the state and Federal courts of New York County, New York.9. Miscellaneous.a. Modification. We reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to modify or replace any of these Terms of Service, or change, suspend, or discontinue the Services at any time. Your continued use of the Services following notification of any changes to these Terms of Service constitutes acceptance of those changes.b. Entire Agreement and Severability. These Terms of Service are the entire agreement between you and us with respect to the Services, including use of the Site, and supersede all prior or contemporaneous communications and proposals (whether oral, written or electronic) between you and us with respect to the Services. If any provision of these Terms of Service is found to be unenforceable or invalid, that provision will be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that these Terms of Service will otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable. The failure of either party to exercise in any respect any right provided for herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any further rights hereunderc. Force Majeure. We shall not be liable for any failure to perform our obligations hereunder where such failure results from any cause beyond our reasonable control, including, without limitation, mechanical, electronic or communications failure or degradation.d. Assignment. These Terms of Service are personal to you, and are not assignable, transferable or sublicensable by you except with our prior written consent. We may assign, transfer or delegate any of our rights and obligations hereunder without consent.e. Agency. No agency, partnership, joint venture, or employment relationship is created as a result of these Terms of Service and neither party has any authority of any kind to bind the other in any respect.f. Notices. Unless otherwise specified in these Term of Service, all notices under these Terms of Service will be in writing and will be deemed to have been duly given when received, if personally delivered or sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested; when receipt is electronically confirmed, if transmitted by facsimile or e-mail; or the day after it is sent, if sent for next day delivery by recognized overnight delivery service. Electronic notices should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org. No Waiver. Our failure to enforce any part of these Terms of Service shall not constitute a waiver of our right to later enforce that or any other part of these Terms of Service. Waiver of compliance in any particular instance does not mean that we will waive compliance in the future. In order for any waiver of compliance with these Terms of Service to be binding, we must provide you with written notice of such waiver through one of our authorized representatives.h. Headings. The section and paragraph headings in these Terms of Service are for convenience only and shall not affect their interpretation.Contact. You may contact us at the following address: 12 E 49th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10017.